On patronage...
Jul. 18th, 2011 05:08 am![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
For the last year or so, I've been pleased to serve as a patron for the work of
ysabetwordsmith . I do so for a number of reasons. First, this is one of the ways that I try to keep creativity alive, especially when so many have to turn away from creative endeavours. Second, the relationship between us, as artist and patron, is one that has been fostered to provide mutual benefit and friendship. Finally, and perhaps most important, by not only giving action to my creative input (i.e., taking prompts for poetry), but also by inspiring and encouraging my own literary output, I'm allowed to taste a little of that creative magic.
Sometimes it seems like many forms of creativity are undervalued. Unless one happens to be exceptionally talented (and connected), it can be very tough to make a secure living on the proceeds of one's creative work, especially for those arts that fall outside of mainstream media (and, let's face it, it's hard to make it in those industries, too). So, quite often, many people, like myself, turn away from following their creative spirit in order to pursue lifestyles with a more stable income. (I'm quite attached to having a regular paycheque; I admit it.) IMHO, this isn't healthy for us as a whole; art, literature, music, dance... these are the stuff of our collective spirit and should be cultivated, allowed to blossom. To this end, I try, when I can, to support the creative arts. I'm nowhere near wealthy enough to fund an endowment, or purchase major pieces of art, but I can put a dollar or two in the hat of a busker, or purchase a piece of jewellery or craft-work (as a present for another) from a local merchant, put a tip in the jar for LJ crowdfunded projects, and (relevant to this post) serve as an LJ patron for a creative spirit. I may not be able to live my dream, but at least I can help a few live theirs.
However, when supporting the creative arts, the relationship between artists and supporters is often just mercantile in nature. You pay the busker to listen to his music, the crafts-person for her wares, and the LJ oracle for her reading and the transaction ends with a nod or a thanks. Not so between artist and patron. Here, a friendly, ongoing, mutually supportive relationship is fostered over time. I not only help to keep the ramen off her table, but I also provide
ysabetwordsmith with constructive feedback for her work. I've even begun to help in promoting it. In return, not only does she produce poetry that I enjoy, but explores topics of mutual interest through both conversation and her work. She even advocates awareness of a cause quite important to me. (I also admit I really like the way she shows her appreciation to her supporters, such as her donor perk posts or the anthologies of Poetry Fishbowl generated poems she's given to her major supporters.)
But more than this, by interacting with her audience, encouraging input and feedback as she does,
ysabetwordsmith draws us into the creative process. We are not mere observers, regarding a finished product we had no hand in, but active participants, providing ideas for her poetry through prompts and conversation. (I imagine that I'm far from the only participant in her Poetry Fishbowl events who takes great delight in seeing what poetry blooms from the seeds we provide.) Furthermore, this involvement inspires me to exercise my own poetic ability, on occasion, which she encourages through feedback. Beyond anything else, perhaps, this is the greatest benefit I derive from being a patron; in a lifestyle largely devoid of opportunity to do so, I get to touch the magic, too.
Edit:
laffingkat raised the excellent point that I neglected to invite others to express their own reasons for why they enjoy being patrons. In my defense, just look a the time stamp for when this post was originally written. XD So does anyone share the same kind of thoughts on patronage as I? Does anyone have any differing ideas? I'm also curious as to how many people in this crowdfunding scene are mostly patrons.
![[info]](https://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=3)
Sometimes it seems like many forms of creativity are undervalued. Unless one happens to be exceptionally talented (and connected), it can be very tough to make a secure living on the proceeds of one's creative work, especially for those arts that fall outside of mainstream media (and, let's face it, it's hard to make it in those industries, too). So, quite often, many people, like myself, turn away from following their creative spirit in order to pursue lifestyles with a more stable income. (I'm quite attached to having a regular paycheque; I admit it.) IMHO, this isn't healthy for us as a whole; art, literature, music, dance... these are the stuff of our collective spirit and should be cultivated, allowed to blossom. To this end, I try, when I can, to support the creative arts. I'm nowhere near wealthy enough to fund an endowment, or purchase major pieces of art, but I can put a dollar or two in the hat of a busker, or purchase a piece of jewellery or craft-work (as a present for another) from a local merchant, put a tip in the jar for LJ crowdfunded projects, and (relevant to this post) serve as an LJ patron for a creative spirit. I may not be able to live my dream, but at least I can help a few live theirs.
However, when supporting the creative arts, the relationship between artists and supporters is often just mercantile in nature. You pay the busker to listen to his music, the crafts-person for her wares, and the LJ oracle for her reading and the transaction ends with a nod or a thanks. Not so between artist and patron. Here, a friendly, ongoing, mutually supportive relationship is fostered over time. I not only help to keep the ramen off her table, but I also provide
![[info]](https://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=3)
But more than this, by interacting with her audience, encouraging input and feedback as she does,
![[info]](https://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=3)
Edit:
![[info]](https://l-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif?v=3)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-18 08:12 pm (UTC)Yes...
Date: 2011-07-18 09:00 pm (UTC)I feel the same way. Buying a mass-market book, the money just gets smeared everywhere -- a few pennies to the bookstore, the distributor, the publisher, the author, the printing press, etc. But putting something in the jar for a new computer at Hunt Press -- SHAZAM! I helped make something happen.
Re: Yes...
Date: 2011-07-19 02:56 am (UTC)True!
Date: 2011-07-18 09:04 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-20 04:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-20 02:26 pm (UTC)I've written more about my feelings in this post (http://minor-architect.livejournal.com/168015.html), if anyone is interested.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 12:56 am (UTC)Perhaps you've seen more comments on my later post because that was written specifically with the intention of starting a discussion, and clearly labeled and tagged as such, with questions for people to respond to.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 01:56 am (UTC)It looks like you've provided some answers to that question already; other patrons could describe how their own experiences have been similar or different. Patrons could also discuss how one person's benefit is another's frustration, thereby creating a list of which crowdfunding techniques work best for different audiences. Unfortunately, not enough patrons have been inclined to speak up and start this kind of conversation.
Perhaps you've seen more comments on my later post because that was written specifically with the intention of starting a discussion, and clearly labeled and tagged as such
This is entirely possible. The comments to that post were an interesting read, partly because of their content and partly because so many creators participated as opposed to patrons (or people who are primarily patrons; I know some belong to both groups). That's another reason why I believed this issue needed a bit more attention and tackled it in my own journal.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 02:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 02:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 07:49 am (UTC)BTW, I've put up a poll concerning crowdfunding demographics: http://crowdfunding.livejournal.com/304255.html
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 03:02 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 07:48 am (UTC)Ooo...
Date: 2011-07-21 06:27 am (UTC)Re: Ooo...
Date: 2011-07-21 07:47 am (UTC)Re: Ooo...
Date: 2011-07-21 07:54 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 02:44 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 03:12 am (UTC)And color me very impressed if this post is an example of how you write in the wee hours! :)
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 04:16 am (UTC)Thank you!
Date: 2011-07-21 06:30 am (UTC)Re: Thank you!
Date: 2011-07-21 06:50 am (UTC)EDIT: Oops! I finally clued in that your remark wasn't intended for me. >.<
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 02:51 pm (UTC)The reason I didn't post my entry on crowdfunding patrons here is because it turned into a bit of a rant and I didn't think it would be fair for me to drop such a thing on this community. Especially when it's
At any rate, I have some replies I'd like to make to the comments you left in my journal but first I have library work to finish. So I'll get back to that as soon as I can.
Thoughts
Date: 2011-07-21 05:20 pm (UTC)Hmm ... it doesn't have any of my markers for "rant" (i.e. personal attacks, blaming, vulgarity) and it encouraged conversation. Perhaps you could simply retouch your points in a way that would make them feel more positive and inviting to you, and share them on
>>I want people to pull up a chair and stay a while, not run screaming into the night because I'm banging my fist on the table. <<
I appreciate the thought. Having an argument in the community would be bad. But we're likely missing out on some people because they don't see the kind of patron presence that would attract them.
If nothing else, I am planning to pick up this conversation next week.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 08:46 pm (UTC)That's a relief to hear, actually. Maybe my post wasn't as off-putting as I'd first thought. (That's me, always erring on the side of caution...!)
Perhaps you could simply retouch your points in a way that would make them feel more positive and inviting to you, and share them on
I could do that, although I wouldn't be able to give you a revised post until this weekend at the earliest. Would that be all right?
Thanks for being so receptive to my opinions. :)
Thoughts
Date: 2011-07-21 08:59 pm (UTC)I'd aim it for Monday, actually. I want to line up some followup content for next week so that we don't go from great traffic to nada. Further discussions of points raised during this week's activity are ideal. Would that work for you?
Also for Monday, I'll pencil in my post about the "we want patrons to speak up" issue.
>>Thanks for being so receptive to my opinions. <<
You're welcome. Thanks for being open about your wants and needs.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-22 03:01 am (UTC)That works fine for me; now I have the whole weekend to tweak that entry. And I agree, to go from a torrent of new content down to a trickle might encourage some of the people who found us during the Spotlight to wander off!
Yay!
Date: 2011-07-22 03:49 am (UTC)Okay, great. You could even show someone your rough draft and polish it further, if you're concerned about the tone.
>> And I agree, to go from a torrent of new content down to a trickle might encourage some of the people who found us during the Spotlight to wander off!<<
So far I have 3 things slated for Monday including yours, 1 each on Wednesday and Thursday, and I'm planning an interview for Tuesday. I have ideas for more stuff that's not slated yet.
(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 02:40 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 01:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2011-07-21 02:51 am (UTC)