A Dis-Recommendation for Web Fiction Guide

[ysabetwordsmith.livejournal.com]

I had reviewed a piece of weblit for Web Fiction Guide, whereat Chris P. pulled down the review because it mentioned cyberfunded creativity, which he considered an 'ad.' So if he is going to be hostile towards cyberfunded creativity, I'm not inclined to post there anymore, and I withdraw my previous recommendation for the site.

I am frustrated and disappointed by the general resistance to crowdfunded projects, as if there's something wrong with creative folks wanting to get paid for their hard work. It's clear that what we really need is a site to promote cyberfunded creativity in particular, with our own listing of projects and creators and donors, supporting resources, awards, and whatever else folks think would be useful. I really wish I had the programming skill to build something like that, but alas, I don't.

Comments

Hmm...

[ysabetwordsmith.livejournal.com]

>>Can I ask what specifically you posted?<<

I'd rather not say. I don't want anyone snapping at the author.

>>It's basically to prevent people from going: "Hey this series was great, just like my series XYZ.<<

All I did was include a bit at the end of the review noting that this project in particular was cyberfunded and that cyberfunded creativity in general was a good way for people to support projects they enjoy.

To me, that's a legitimate part of a review for a project. If that's not welcome on Web Fiction Guide, then I don't care to post there anymore. They can do whatever they wish with their site, and I can choose to spend my time somewhere else.

Re: Hmm...

[isachi.livejournal.com]

I actually meant what you said in your review, not what you were reviewing ^_^;;; But no matter, I'm sorry you had a bad experience.