I think a set but not infinite/unlimited time period where a previous winner cannot be reconsidered would be the best compromise. After all, if a project does continue over many years anad continues to be popular over that timespan - yes, we should be able to vote for them again to acknowledge that! I think a simple one-year disbarring after a project wins would be the easiest way to do that, and then in the future it could be re-visited if needed.
In my mind, this would be one a per individual story/project/site/patron basis. Other works by an author, cartoonist, composer, etc. would be still be eligible. I.e. if Author X writes story A & story B, and story A wins, then it is specifically story A that is ineligible for the next year, but story B could still be nominated.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
zvi![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png){kind=small}
Re: Well...
Date: 2011-03-21 11:10 pm (UTC)In my mind, this would be one a per individual story/project/site/patron basis. Other works by an author, cartoonist, composer, etc. would be still be eligible. I.e. if Author X writes story A & story B, and story A wins, then it is specifically story A that is ineligible for the next year, but story B could still be nominated.
My thoughts on it, anyway.