(no subject)

Date: 2011-02-07 01:44 am (UTC)
I'm curious why everybody voting for as many as they like would intrinsically be a bad thing... being able to vote repeatedly would obviously be cheating, but being able to vote exactly one time for each work that one feels deserves credit would 1) still produce useful results in determining which work is most respected/influential and 2) not skew things at all based on position. It's not as though everybody will vote for all entries.

That would be a way of narrowing the field down to the picks that will fit in a single poll, which could then be done with radio buttons.

I realize the contest is already underway and that it's no time to be talking about changing the arrangements now, so I'll be repeating these comments on any discussion that happens afterwards. I just wanted to put them out there now.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

crowdfunding: Ship with butterflies for sails, captioned "Crowdfunding" (Default)
Crowdfunding: Connecting Creators and Patrons

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags